🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is seeking damages amounting to $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step represents a clear warning from the Kremlin regarding proposals to use frozen Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on reports in Russian news outlets, the central bank filed a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will determine later this week regarding a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and economic stability.

Most of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's immobilised sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

European Union officials have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any utilization of the funds as theft. Authorities have threatened reciprocal measures, such as confiscating EU private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a key role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

In comments seen as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official described the assets plan as "a severe assault on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the latest legal action. It has previously stated it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, if such assets can be located," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are working on measures to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European entities. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Ukraine would only be obligated to repay the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction caused during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful signal that if you do all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."